Viability of Switching Practice Areas for Attorneys: A Detailed Exploration
 

The Specialized Nature of Law Practice


In large law firms, attorneys are often hired for their expertise in a specific practice area. These firms, particularly those in big law, rely on their attorneys to be specialists, providing clients with deep knowledge and experience in niche areas. For example, a corporate attorney in a large New York firm might focus exclusively on capital markets or mergers and acquisitions (M&A), without touching other corporate work. This specialization is one of the reasons clients are willing to pay high fees—they expect a level of expertise that only comes from deep, focused experience.

Because of this, transitioning to a different practice area within such a firm can be extremely difficult. Clients expect their legal representatives to be highly specialized, and law firms are generally reluctant to hire or even retain attorneys who do not fit this mold.
 


See Related Articles:
 

Common Motivations for Switching Practice Areas


Attorneys may want to switch practice areas for a variety of reasons. Some discover that their initial choice of practice does not suit their interests or strengths. Others might be drawn to a different area after exposure to it, perhaps through a case or client that piqued their interest. However, a significant number of attorneys who seek to switch practice areas do so out of dissatisfaction, hoping that a change in focus will renew their passion for the law.

Despite these motivations, it is important to understand that dissatisfaction in one practice area might not necessarily be resolved by switching to another. In some cases, the underlying issue is not the practice area itself, but rather a broader discontent with the legal profession as a whole.

 

Challenges of Switching Practice Areas