Cattie

Cattie is one of the nation's most well-respected names in the Medicare Set-Aside (MSA) legal community. He has personally reviewed or overseen the review of over 10,000 distinct fact patterns, answering the question "Is an MSA appropriate based on these specific facts and if so, for how much?" on behalf of his clients. His analysis and methods have been validated in federal and state court opinions such as Smith v. Marine Terminals of Arkansas, Tye v. Upper Valley Medical Center, and Doe v. Company X. These courts have cited his work as "comprehensive and detailed", "reasonable and reliable", and "...more credible [than others] in the liability context." (emphasis added). In each case, the client's future medical obligation was minimized or extinguished based on how Cattie analyzed the MSA issue.