Shoplifting Law deals with theft crimes that are committed against retail establishments. These crimes are committed by shoppers who enter the establishment with permission but conceal merchandise before leaving without paying or defraud the retail establishment's system to pay less than the actual price.
When a shoplifter steals goods from a store, they may find a substantial amount of natural resources such as paper and metal. Clunky electronics also contain a lot of plastic and glass.
Merchant Holds an Absolute Right to the Person Arrested
A merchant or landing proprietor may detain for prosecution any person he has reasonable grounds for believing has criminally attempted to steal the goods in his dock.
If the arrest is lawful, the person arrested may be detained in custody for at least twenty-four hours.
Example 1: A person attempted to steal alcohol and then run from the store with the alcohol. When the store owner tried to stop the person, the person resisted and threw a bottle of alcohol at the store owner.
In this case, the merchant may detain the person in custody for at least twenty-four hours. The merchant may file a complaint at the Justice of the Peace Court.
Shoplifting crimes are rare, but they do occur. Usually, the only involvement from the police is when they happen to be called to the scene after being contacted by store employees.
They may not be final since the shipper's decision concerning future consignments remains open. It faces from: the company's decision under this paragraph to place the customer on a national "do not ship" list, which generally is final; or the company's decision under this paragraph to refuse to ship to the customer in the future, which the courier can appeal by complaining to the State commission.
Upon detaining a suspect, legal or factual questions need not be resolved. However, how the employee carries out, the detention depends upon the factual circumstances. If the employee sees a customer conceal merchandise, the employee may approach the customer to inquire if they have a store receipt. The employee may also attempt to apprehend the customer. Still, if the customer tries to leave without cooperating, the employee would generally be acting within the law by stepping in front of the customer and preventing escape. Whereas, if the employee hears secondhand information from a bystander without any direct knowledge to the contrary, the employee would likely violate the law by grabbing hold of a customer and engaging in a physical struggle to prevent the suspected theft.
A client was accused of shoplifting and questioned by the police. It was an embarrassing experience for him. I know the Miranda rights backward and forward.
Shoplifting crimes should be handled seriously by the courts. While only an attorney can perform a complete review of the case and find all the weaknesses in the prosecution's case, the intent is the key to any successful defense. Because innocent actions can be misconstrued, the intent element often presents a hurdle for prosecutors in these cases.
Always consider intent, but never forget to look at the entire picture. The prosecution must prove everything beyond a reasonable doubt, and even the smallest gap in that proof can result in an acquittal.
Even when the merchant's evidence against a shoplifting suspect seems rock-solid, the long-term ramifications of a conviction may outweigh the short-term gains of a guilty plea. When merchants fail to appear in court to testify against the defendant, the case is often dismissed because the patient is in limbothe prosecution can't move forward with the matter. The accused cannot plead guilty to a crime that has never formally been charged.
Plea bargaining is another option available to defendants. The idea is to compromise with the prosecutor to agree to plead guilty to a less negative charge. A prosecutor may offer to drop some of the charges in exchange for the defendant's plea, or to the defendant's advantage, to simply plea to lesser charges.